Reading Response: PART DEUCE

The essay that I chose to review was my argumentaive essay on caging wild animals. Honestly, I tried to anticipate as many objections to my postion against caging the animals as possible, I now believe that my argument could have been much stronger.Not once did I attribute my objections to anyone, and I could have used greater detail with less refutable facts. I wish I would have read the naysayer chapter before I began my essay because, not only would my points have been stronger and with more substance, but my position would have been clear to my audience and to myself.